Cosubstitution, Derivational Locality, and Quantifier Scope
نویسنده
چکیده
Quantifier scope challenges the mantra of Tree Adjoining Grammar (TAG) that all syntactic dependencies are local once syntactic recursion has been factored out. The reason is that on current TAG analyses, a quantifier and the furthest reaches of its scope domain are in general not part of any (unicomponent) elementary tree. In this paper, I consider a novel basic TAG operation called COSUBSTITUTION. In normal substitution, the root of one tree (the argument) replaces a matching non-terminal on the frontier of another tree (the functor). In cosubstitution, the syntactic result is the same, leaving weak and strong generative capacity unchanged, but the derivational and semantic roles are reversed: the embedded subtree is viewed as the functor, and the embedding matrix is viewed as its semantic argument, i.e., as its nuclear scope. On this view, a quantifier taking scope amounts to entering a derivation at the exact moment that its nuclear scope has been constructed. Thus the relationship of a quantifier and its scope is constrained by DERIVATIONAL LOCALITY rather than by elementary-tree locality.
منابع مشابه
On the Form-Meaning Relations Definable by CoTAGs
Adding cosubstitution to the classical TAG operations of substitution and adjunction, coTAGs have been proposed as an “alternative conceptualization” to resolve the tension between the TAG mantra of locality of syntactic dependencies and the seeming non-locality of quantifier scope. CoTAGs follow the tradition of synchronous TAGs (STAGs) in that they derive syntactic and semantic representation...
متن کاملScope Economy and TAG Locality
This paper gives an analysis explaining various cases where the scope of two logical operators is non-permutable in a sentence. The explanation depends on a theory of derivational economy couched in the synchronous tree adjoining grammar framework. Locality restrictions made using the STAG formalism allow us to limit the computational complexity of using transderivational constraints and allows...
متن کاملWhat’s in an island?
The primary aim of this paper is to argue that a unified approach to strong and weak islands is misguided: strong and weak islands are different phenomena, to be accounted for at different levels of representation. Our central claim is that a theory of locality that represents these islands in one level cannot capture the pattern of island sensitivity exhibited by the various grammatical depend...
متن کاملFactoring Predicate Argument and Scope Semantics: Underspecified Semantics with LTAG
In this paper we propose a compositional semantics for lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar (LTAG). Tree-local multicomponent derivations allow separation of the semantic contribution of a lexical item into one component contributing to the predicate argument structure and a second component contributing to scope semantics. Based on this idea a syntax-semantics interface is presented where the co...
متن کاملCoTAGs and ACGs
Our main concern is to provide a complete picture of how coTAGs, as a particular variant within the general framework of tree adjoining grammars (TAGs), can be captured under the notion of abstract categorial grammars (ACGs). coTAGs have been introduced by Barker [1] as an “alternative conceptualization” in order to cope with the tension between the TAG-mantra of the “locality of syntactic depe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010